Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38421 - 38430 of 74587 for public records.

[PDF] State v. James M. Moran
. § 974.07. After referring the matter to the Office of the State Public Defender for possible appointment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6222 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jo Ann Leszcynski
that “[a]ny person who operated a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state … is deemed to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18383 - 2005-05-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
access was accomplished by the westward extension of an existing public road, Frohling Lane, to reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas L. Leck
. Not recommended for publication in the official reports. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10119 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
not shock the public conscience that Mejia received a thirty-five year sentence for causing Pina’s death
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116919 - 2014-07-14

[PDF] Jevic Enterprises, Inc. v. Arlo E. Schultz
and applied by the public, and as it is used in a number of state statutes and regulations. An exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3927 - 2017-09-20

Katherine Kellner v. Dean A. Kellner
. Not recommended for publication in the official reports. [1] The Department of Health and Social Services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14359 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Asset Acceptance could not personally serve Curiel, so it served him by publication and mailing. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30224 - 2007-09-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
character and rehabilitative needs, the need to protect the public, and the gravity of the offense. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156311 - 2017-09-21

Lynda M. Boser Larson v. Bernard Seidling
to public policy, the court has no right to modify its terms. See Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co., 92 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2908 - 2005-03-31