Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38421 - 38430 of 74587 for public records.

Doris M. Hoopingarner v. Town of Lakewood
accumulation is a more specific public safety issue than the generic safety concerns of the safe place statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16279 - 2005-03-31

Myra Levine (Heilprin) v. Richard Heilprin
the intent was to "curb the outflow of public assistance for child support." He argues that it interferes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7892 - 2005-03-31

Gene L. Olstad v. Microsoft Corporation
analysis of public policy as well as law.[4] Accordingly, we conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1250 - 2004-02-16

[PDF] NOTICE
received. See WIS. STAT. § 49.95(9) (2003-04)1 (a person receiving public assistance must inform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26777 - 2014-09-15

WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS OFFICE OF THE CLERK Telephone: 608-266-1880 110 E. Main Street, Suite 215...
., Publication Committee. The court having filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142623 - 2015-06-07

[PDF] Genevieve Langreck v. Cathy Gorst
diligent land owner and the public that the possessor claimed the land as his or her own. See Pierz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15796 - 2017-09-21

State v. Cleveland R. Barnes
, the court’s sentence was based upon his individual culpability and the need to protect the public. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5066 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tony Chaney v. Jeffery Endicott
in carrying out their duties as public officials. The trial court agreed that Endicott was not subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10927 - 2017-09-20

Judi Ann Koonce v. George Earl Koonce
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. Not recommended for publication in the official reports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2944 - 2005-03-31

Eugene C. Rondon v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. Because the purpose of the assessment is to remediate the damage done to the public treasury—rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5048 - 2005-03-31