Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38431 - 38440 of 62336 for child support.
Search results 38431 - 38440 of 62336 for child support.
Frederick Rogers v. DOC
, the department filed a “Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss,” in which it argued the sovereign immunity defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21703 - 2006-03-08
, the department filed a “Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss,” in which it argued the sovereign immunity defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21703 - 2006-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence to support the commitment order. At trial, Dr. Anthony Jurek testified that James had a mental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=544743 - 2022-07-19
evidence to support the commitment order. At trial, Dr. Anthony Jurek testified that James had a mental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=544743 - 2022-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
basis to support this argument. ¶7 The Willans argue that the Board was required to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881492 - 2024-11-27
basis to support this argument. ¶7 The Willans argue that the Board was required to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=881492 - 2024-11-27
State v. Delbert L. Manke
of a trial court, if it can conclude ab initio that there are facts of record which would support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9402 - 2005-03-31
of a trial court, if it can conclude ab initio that there are facts of record which would support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9402 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that restitution cannot repair. It considered that twenty-three-year-old Kienast committed the crimes to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132561 - 2017-09-21
that restitution cannot repair. It considered that twenty-three-year-old Kienast committed the crimes to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132561 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the call was made. The caller’s identity was at stake and this supports a conclusion about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30026 - 2014-09-15
the call was made. The caller’s identity was at stake and this supports a conclusion about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30026 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, and Attorney Moorshead filed a supplemental no-merit report and supporting affidavit. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863177 - 2024-10-14
a response, and Attorney Moorshead filed a supplemental no-merit report and supporting affidavit. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863177 - 2024-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ingress and egress over LHM’s driveway. Zorman submitted a supporting affidavit and LHM submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67958 - 2014-09-15
ingress and egress over LHM’s driveway. Zorman submitted a supporting affidavit and LHM submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67958 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to support the guilty verdicts; (10) the (ir)relevance of a counselor’s testimony regarding Burkett’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
to support the guilty verdicts; (10) the (ir)relevance of a counselor’s testimony regarding Burkett’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
reasoning, we will uphold a discretionary decision if there are facts in the record which would support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113965 - 2014-06-10
reasoning, we will uphold a discretionary decision if there are facts in the record which would support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113965 - 2014-06-10