Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38441 - 38450 of 55162 for n c.
Search results 38441 - 38450 of 55162 for n c.
COURT OF APPEALS
him by concluding that he had caused the heroin death of the woman. “[I]n a motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
him by concluding that he had caused the heroin death of the woman. “[I]n a motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 125.07(1)(a). Section 125.07(1)(a) states that “[n]o person may procure for, sell, dispense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
. Stat. § 125.07(1)(a). Section 125.07(1)(a) states that “[n]o person may procure for, sell, dispense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
State v. Charles Jones
)] (1997-98). Id. at 229 n.2. [4] This court acknowledges that two of the issues Jones presents—whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16139 - 2005-03-31
)] (1997-98). Id. at 229 n.2. [4] This court acknowledges that two of the issues Jones presents—whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16139 - 2005-03-31
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
., 102 Wis.2d 305, 306 n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292, 294 (Ct. App. 1981). On this basis alone, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
., 102 Wis.2d 305, 306 n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292, 294 (Ct. App. 1981). On this basis alone, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion. State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 367 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
erroneously exercised its discretion. State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 367 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
where the facts are in dispute. See Wurtz v. Fleischman, 97 Wis. 2d 100, 107 n.3, 293 N.W.2d 155
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192506 - 2017-09-21
where the facts are in dispute. See Wurtz v. Fleischman, 97 Wis. 2d 100, 107 n.3, 293 N.W.2d 155
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192506 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Unsupported legal assertions need not be considered. See State v. Lindell, 2001 WI 108, ¶23 n.8, 238 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134436 - 2015-02-04
. Unsupported legal assertions need not be considered. See State v. Lindell, 2001 WI 108, ¶23 n.8, 238 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134436 - 2015-02-04
[PDF]
State v. Maurice Simmons
and just reason for a plea withdrawal. State v. Shimek, 230 Wis. 2d 730, 740 n.2, 601 N.W.2d 865 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18374 - 2017-09-21
and just reason for a plea withdrawal. State v. Shimek, 230 Wis. 2d 730, 740 n.2, 601 N.W.2d 865 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18374 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and cooperativeness, the need for close rehabilitative control, and the rights of the public. Id., ¶43 n.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27403 - 2014-09-15
and cooperativeness, the need for close rehabilitative control, and the rights of the public. Id., ¶43 n.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a proper subject for commitment” as “[i]n my previous treatment with her, when she was off commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261502 - 2020-05-20
a proper subject for commitment” as “[i]n my previous treatment with her, when she was off commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261502 - 2020-05-20