Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38451 - 38460 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
including two counts of attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181197 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Thomas M. Teubel v. Prime Development, Inc.
to the sheriff’s department for a fingerprint analysis. Subsequently, the defendant filed a motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3879 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and additionally asked the court to award him fees, costs, and damages. ¶4 Woodall-Vogg filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928561 - 2025-03-18

[PDF] Robb W. Jensen v. School District of Rhinelander
release. The trial court granted Jensen’s motion for a preliminary injunction, restraining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4159 - 2017-09-20

Denise Scheberle v. Bertram Milson, M.D.
. In response to the summary judgment motion, Condon submitted an affidavit in which he stated that if he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5633 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Paul F. Wischer
of conviction of repeated sexual assault of the same child and from an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6657 - 2017-09-20

Ira Lee Anderson v. Jane Gamble
: August 16, 2000 Submitted on a Petition: April 24, 2000 Submitted on a Motion: April 28, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2259 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion.1 On appeal, Tate contends that the postconviction court erroneously found that a change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982982 - 2025-07-15

State v. Walter Horngren
it denied his motion to suppress evidence, which alleged that the police were not justified to enter his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15839 - 2005-03-31

Bank of New York v. David H. Mills
their motion for reconsideration of its confirmation. The Millses argue that the trial court erred as a matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6502 - 2005-03-31