Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38451 - 38460 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 38451 - 38460 of 62360 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
outlining the pretrial offer. The letter does not support Harrell’s contention that the repeater enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142461 - 2015-05-26
outlining the pretrial offer. The letter does not support Harrell’s contention that the repeater enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142461 - 2015-05-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a factual basis to support the No. 2025AP603-CRNM 3 charge, ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071608 - 2026-02-04
of a factual basis to support the No. 2025AP603-CRNM 3 charge, ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071608 - 2026-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
profiling are “merely conclusory in nature and without factual support,” and that Dawson “fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984108 - 2025-07-22
profiling are “merely conclusory in nature and without factual support,” and that Dawson “fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984108 - 2025-07-22
CA Blank Order
manifest injustice such as coercion, the lack of a factual basis to support the charge, ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121563 - 2014-09-08
manifest injustice such as coercion, the lack of a factual basis to support the charge, ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121563 - 2014-09-08
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Mola
factual basis to support his plea; the State withheld exculpatory evidence and breached the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13860 - 2014-09-15
factual basis to support his plea; the State withheld exculpatory evidence and breached the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13860 - 2014-09-15
State v. Martin Patterson
N.W.2d 548, 552 (1987). Where the trial court has not expressly made a finding necessary to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10235 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 548, 552 (1987). Where the trial court has not expressly made a finding necessary to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10235 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dexter Tolefree
filed a pro se document with the trial court entitled “BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
filed a pro se document with the trial court entitled “BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CORRECT SENTENCE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The finding stands unless the defendant shows the facts are “clearly insufficient” to support the probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36796 - 2014-09-15
. The finding stands unless the defendant shows the facts are “clearly insufficient” to support the probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36796 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that Kevin failed to present sufficient evidence to support any of his claims against Stephen, and entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99905 - 2013-07-24
that Kevin failed to present sufficient evidence to support any of his claims against Stephen, and entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99905 - 2013-07-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
The circuit court’s findings are supported by the record. Lambert testified that when the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63041 - 2014-09-15
The circuit court’s findings are supported by the record. Lambert testified that when the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63041 - 2014-09-15