Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38451 - 38460 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a green substance that later tested positive to be marijuana and then also would appear to be cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585401 - 2022-11-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the State, but stated that he did not think that was the test. Defense counsel stated that, in his view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74579 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Lois Tabar v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
discomfort. Shortly thereafter, tests revealed that she had a brain aneurysm. Tabar underwent several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7855 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Appeal No. 2010AP1398-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF32
the warrant preference rule that this court has traditionally recognized, utilizes a balancing test
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68708 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
misconduct, the test applied is whether the statements ‘so infected the trial with unfairness as to make
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771390 - 2024-03-05

[PDF] State v. Lynnsie F.
on "another ... look" or the "second prong test" of prosecutive merit. In response, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10781 - 2017-09-20

State v. Iola H.
are weighed in a balancing test to determine whether the probative value of the prior conviction evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6396 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
] State v. Hauk, 2002 WI App 226, 257 Wis. 2d 579, 652 N.W.2d 393. [9] Without the tests of: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29268 - 2007-06-04

COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion, rather than probable cause, is the proper test for the stop of Baake’s vehicle, and contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46660 - 2010-02-03

State v. Gordon Dain
by the following test in assessing the trial court’s denial of Dain’s motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13809 - 2005-03-31