Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38461 - 38470 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 38461 - 38470 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Joshua W.
to the obstructing charge as “count one” when it was in fact “count four.” We find no basis for this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9444 - 2017-09-19
to the obstructing charge as “count one” when it was in fact “count four.” We find no basis for this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9444 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the ineffective-assistance claim on appeal. While he never disputed that he killed Redmer or disposed of her body
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88861 - 2012-11-06
the ineffective-assistance claim on appeal. While he never disputed that he killed Redmer or disposed of her body
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88861 - 2012-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
—“this was clearly a cold-blooded killing.” The court refuted the claim that Miller’s actions were related to self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
—“this was clearly a cold-blooded killing.” The court refuted the claim that Miller’s actions were related to self
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
State v. Latasha B.
claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it terminated her parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6413 - 2005-03-31
claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it terminated her parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6413 - 2005-03-31
Gentek Building Products, Inc. v. Arnold Check
a non-earnings garnishment claim against Check; Gentek’s claim named Richards garnishee-defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14090 - 2005-03-31
a non-earnings garnishment claim against Check; Gentek’s claim named Richards garnishee-defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14090 - 2005-03-31
Lawrence E. Diez v. Oneida County Child Support Agency
an order finding him in contempt for failing to pay child support. He claims that the circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15191 - 2005-03-31
an order finding him in contempt for failing to pay child support. He claims that the circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15191 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
fundamental claim is that: (1) he was never charged with armed burglary, and someone else—here, he alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62865 - 2011-04-18
fundamental claim is that: (1) he was never charged with armed burglary, and someone else—here, he alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62865 - 2011-04-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
the underlying WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, seeking to withdraw his plea. He claimed his plea was not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62656 - 2014-09-15
the underlying WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion, seeking to withdraw his plea. He claimed his plea was not knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62656 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
by 2 Steven H. brought his argument under an ineffective assistance of counsel claim and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28513 - 2014-09-15
by 2 Steven H. brought his argument under an ineffective assistance of counsel claim and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28513 - 2014-09-15
Theresa L. C. v. Jeremy C. P.
with any third party about his desire to visit Talya to avoid a claim of abandonment. She claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7084 - 2005-03-31
with any third party about his desire to visit Talya to avoid a claim of abandonment. She claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7084 - 2005-03-31