Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38471 - 38480 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
properly rejected Weczera’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel predicated on trial counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28

[PDF] State v. Charles B. Bushong
claimed was required by the IAD. DISCUSSION ¶6 The IAD, codified in Wisconsin at WIS. STAT. § 976.05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5654 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
consistent with his needs. There is thus neither an arguable claim that a formal petition to modify
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443292 - 2021-10-19

State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant bears the burden to establish both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Secura Insurance Company v. Jerry Brubaker
of whether the circuit court had “just cause” to dismiss his claim, as that term is used in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6087 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
postconviction motion. We begin with his claim of a new factor based on the Static-99R assessment tool
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094435 - 2026-03-25

[PDF] State v. Andre L. Lee
. The circuit court denied this claim because it did not find the new testimony credible. ¶3 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6741 - 2017-09-20

State v. Paul Michael Davis
unlawfully stopped him. He also claims that the State failed to establish that the intoxilyzer machine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13128 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Robert J. Goldammer v. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc.
a claim. Construction of a statute is a question of law that we decide without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14201 - 2014-09-15

State v. Timothy J. Davids
ineffective assistance of counsel. To prevail on this claim, Davids would have to show that (1) his counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12153 - 2005-03-31