Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38481 - 38490 of 62306 for child support.
Search results 38481 - 38490 of 62306 for child support.
State v. Joseph Gilmore
, for the purpose of attacking or supporting the witness's credibility, ... may not be proved by extrinsic evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8519 - 2005-03-31
, for the purpose of attacking or supporting the witness's credibility, ... may not be proved by extrinsic evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8519 - 2005-03-31
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
not be cited as precedent or authority, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127902 - 2014-11-10
not be cited as precedent or authority, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127902 - 2014-11-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
existed to support McMullen’s plea. We are satisfied that the plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
existed to support McMullen’s plea. We are satisfied that the plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
Michael S. MacLeish v. Peter R. Kleinschmidt
to support their claim that the curling shingles were a defect. The Kleinschmidts offered into evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24550 - 2006-03-21
to support their claim that the curling shingles were a defect. The Kleinschmidts offered into evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24550 - 2006-03-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not support a mistake defense. The circuit court concluded that Peterson was not prejudiced by trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341462 - 2021-03-03
not support a mistake defense. The circuit court concluded that Peterson was not prejudiced by trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341462 - 2021-03-03
2009AP1789 State of Wisconsin v. Jennifer E. Beaty
support a traffic stop. We disagree, because a slight swerve over the center line is enough to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45872 - 2010-01-19
support a traffic stop. We disagree, because a slight swerve over the center line is enough to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45872 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
6 Ortiz relies solely on the victim’s single in-court statement in support of his assertion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
6 Ortiz relies solely on the victim’s single in-court statement in support of his assertion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The no-merit report addresses whether there exist any arguably meritorious grounds supporting the withdrawal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178530 - 2017-09-21
. The no-merit report addresses whether there exist any arguably meritorious grounds supporting the withdrawal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178530 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
records should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the subpoena lacked probable cause
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147260 - 2015-08-24
records should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the subpoena lacked probable cause
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147260 - 2015-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
establish a manifest injustice supporting plea withdrawal and does so by showing that he or she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27922 - 2007-01-29
establish a manifest injustice supporting plea withdrawal and does so by showing that he or she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27922 - 2007-01-29