Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38481 - 38490 of 74981 for judgment for us.
Search results 38481 - 38490 of 74981 for judgment for us.
Sally Gakenheimer v. Lydia May Hanisch
that Lydia would not use. Sally lived in Delaware. Lydia and Harold resided in Fond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10698 - 2005-03-31
that Lydia would not use. Sally lived in Delaware. Lydia and Harold resided in Fond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10698 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
even though he asked to proceed pro se. Higginbotham urges us to permit him to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31
even though he asked to proceed pro se. Higginbotham urges us to permit him to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6895 - 2005-03-31
G-Store, Inc. v. Department of Commerce
-Store’s property was used as a filling station until May 1998. State law requires that after twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4182 - 2005-03-31
-Store’s property was used as a filling station until May 1998. State law requires that after twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4182 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
even though he asked to proceed pro se. Higginbotham urges us to permit him to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
even though he asked to proceed pro se. Higginbotham urges us to permit him to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6897 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In reviewing an administrative agency’s exercise of discretion, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145377 - 2017-09-21
. In reviewing an administrative agency’s exercise of discretion, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145377 - 2017-09-21
Clarence Pelton v. Division of Hearing and Appeals
, which affirmed. He now appeals to us. STANDARD OF REVIEW Judicial review of certiorari actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11718 - 2005-03-31
, which affirmed. He now appeals to us. STANDARD OF REVIEW Judicial review of certiorari actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11718 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael I.
§ 767.32(1)(a), STATS., a judgment providing for child support may be revised "only upon a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15482 - 2017-09-21
§ 767.32(1)(a), STATS., a judgment providing for child support may be revised "only upon a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15482 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
decision, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the administrative decision maker. Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
decision, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the administrative decision maker. Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Kachinsky, is pursuing consolidated appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
. Kachinsky, is pursuing consolidated appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Kachinsky, is pursuing consolidated appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05
. Kachinsky, is pursuing consolidated appeals from judgments of conviction and a postconviction order under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007490 - 2025-09-05