Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38481 - 38490 of 44165 for name change.
Search results 38481 - 38490 of 44165 for name change.
Ronald D. Tym v. Helen M. Ludwig
Source of APPEAL Appeal from a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8219 - 2005-03-31
Source of APPEAL Appeal from a judgment Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8219 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Clark Wolff v. Town of Jamestown
and Zoning Committee,” all of whom are named as parties. The positions of these three entities may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14645 - 2017-09-21
and Zoning Committee,” all of whom are named as parties. The positions of these three entities may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14645 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factors, namely, “the gravity of the offense, the character of the defendant, and the need to protect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877041 - 2024-11-19
factors, namely, “the gravity of the offense, the character of the defendant, and the need to protect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877041 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intimidation charge that was below the statutory maximum after considering proper sentencing factors—namely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713899 - 2023-10-11
intimidation charge that was below the statutory maximum after considering proper sentencing factors—namely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713899 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
State v. William A. Rouse
alternative argument, namely, that we could affirm the order on the basis that it was “a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3752 - 2017-09-19
alternative argument, namely, that we could affirm the order on the basis that it was “a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3752 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in § 766.555—namely, a set of rules for determining whether obligations that a spouse incurs under an “open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051705 - 2025-12-18
in § 766.555—namely, a set of rules for determining whether obligations that a spouse incurs under an “open
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051705 - 2025-12-18
Paige K.B. v. Louis J. Molepske
the immunity by merely bringing the suit in the name of the children, the ploy would ravage the principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11411 - 2005-03-31
the immunity by merely bringing the suit in the name of the children, the ploy would ravage the principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
it considered but rejected doing, namely, continued the dispositional hearing to obtain further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35529 - 2014-09-15
it considered but rejected doing, namely, continued the dispositional hearing to obtain further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35529 - 2014-09-15
Winnebago County v. Mark S. Lisiecki
Lisiecki’s name through the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) records and that Lisiecki’s license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4801 - 2005-03-31
Lisiecki’s name through the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) records and that Lisiecki’s license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4801 - 2005-03-31
Winnebago County v. Mark S. Lisiecki
Lisiecki’s name through the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) records and that Lisiecki’s license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4800 - 2005-03-31
Lisiecki’s name through the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (DOT) records and that Lisiecki’s license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4800 - 2005-03-31