Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38481 - 38490 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
also claims it to be important that there was nothing in the affidavit showing the recovered mail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71130 - 2011-09-20

Apollo Travel Services Partnership v. Universal-Heritage Travel
and ticketing systems. We reject UHT’s claim that Apollo’s demand for fees was based on enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15205 - 2005-03-31

Brenda Fox v. Daniel Larson
claims the trial court erred in concluding that a letter he had written in response to the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3766 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the default judgment. She claimed that the complaint failed to comply with Wis. Stat. § 425.109(1)(a) and (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52528 - 2010-07-27

COURT OF APPEALS
. 1995). Accordingly, Rockefeller claims the circuit court erroneously denied his petition to modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72908 - 2011-10-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in an effort to support a claim for systemic negligence and administrative error1 by calling an officer from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905105 - 2025-01-28

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
the certainty of his or her claim. See Carlson & Erickson Bldrs., Inc. v. Lampert Yards, Inc., 190 Wis. 2d 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28513 - 2007-03-19

State v. Phillip W. Spagnola
. In disposing of the defendant's claim, the Goodrow court employed an analysis which we find persuasive. While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8297 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Justin H.
that Justin “needs to be taken off the streets.” However, he claimed that “corrections” is not the place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9425 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
fundamental claim is that: (1) he was never charged with armed burglary, and someone else—here, he alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62865 - 2011-04-18