Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38481 - 38490 of 58245 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Lynda Kramschuster v. Shawn E.
E., a minor in McClelland’s hunting party. Kramschuster contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11687 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Honeycrest Farms, Inc. v. Brave Harvestore Systems, Inc.
because the applicable statutes of limitation had expired, and the trial court granted the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10628 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
as to the length of extended supervision. Trial counsel confirmed that the State correctly described the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117455 - 2014-07-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Andersen’s claims. ¶6 Andersen filed a demand for a trial in the circuit court. State Collection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87122 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
home at the time. A video recording of the interview was played at trial. ¶3 At trial, Hannah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58835 - 2011-01-10

State v. Geraldine A. Molzner
of their right to a jury trial. The Molzners said they understood the potential penalties and the rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15091 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Mall Properties, LLC v. Younkers, Inc.
judgment without deference, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20110 - 2006-01-09

[PDF] County of Green Lake v. Clinton L. Duhm
. § 961.573(1). Duhm argues that the trial court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6056 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
(Ct. App. 1979) and any other proceedings deemed necessary by the trial court. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27585 - 2014-09-15

Dings Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of the administrative law judge as its own. Dings then sought review in the trial court, pursuant to § 102.23(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13786 - 2005-03-31