Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38491 - 38500 of 98406 for court records search online.

Northland Whitehall Apartments Limited Partnership v. City of Whitehall Board of Review
, we review the “‘record made before the board of review,’” not the circuit court’s decision. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21521 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] Northland Whitehall Apartments Limited Partnership v. City of Whitehall Board of Review
2006 WI APP 60 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2004AP2941
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21521 - 2017-09-21

State v. Adam Procell
previous unblemished record. The court concluded that Procell had no needs, except separation from gang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11980 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Adam Procell
considerably on Procell’s age and his previous unblemished record. The court concluded that Procell had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11980 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the report was marked, the record shows the State never offered and the court never received the report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84078 - 2014-09-15

State v. Thomas D. Gogin
The circuit court found that the telephone records would have been of some use to the defense. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2857 - 2005-03-31

City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
, the record had been remanded to the municipal court. Vernon appealed, and we concluded that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16113 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Town of Madison v. Randall E. Gartland
court is required by statute to record its proceedings. WISCONSIN STAT. § 800.13 provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3530 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the in- court voice identification was proper, we see no prejudice. Since the audio recording
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103519 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
actually ordered Green to pay the DNA surcharge that appeared in court records as an obligation. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69080 - 2014-09-15