Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 92943 for a v i.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 92943 for a v i.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28002 - 2007-02-05
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28002 - 2007-02-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. HURCEL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28828 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. HURCEL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28828 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2006AP1117-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2000CF1632 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28828 - 2007-06-26
. Appeal No. 2006AP1117-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2000CF1632 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28828 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. DENNIS C. STRONG, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160744 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENT, V. DENNIS C. STRONG, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160744 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 50
: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles Lamar, Defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66884 - 2014-09-15
: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles Lamar, Defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66884 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
Title: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles Lamar, Defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66884 - 2011-06-28
Title: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles Lamar, Defendant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66884 - 2011-06-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court ...
Our supreme court, in Powell v. State, 86 Wis. 2d 51, 271 N.W.2d 610 (1978), noted that “‘[i]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70115 - 2011-08-22
Our supreme court, in Powell v. State, 86 Wis. 2d 51, 271 N.W.2d 610 (1978), noted that “‘[i]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70115 - 2011-08-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
, V. MICHAEL L. WITTMERSHAUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41618 - 2014-09-15
, V. MICHAEL L. WITTMERSHAUS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41618 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Regardless, I would reject such an argument after comparing the facts here to those in State v. Wille, 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41618 - 2009-09-30
. Regardless, I would reject such an argument after comparing the facts here to those in State v. Wille, 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41618 - 2009-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENT, V. CORTEZ RAMON BROOKS, I, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76240 - 2014-09-15
-RESPONDENT, V. CORTEZ RAMON BROOKS, I, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76240 - 2014-09-15

