Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 29393 for er.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 29393 for er.
State v. Jose S. Soto
a new trial. Soto claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his postconviction motion; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6784 - 2005-03-31
a new trial. Soto claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying his postconviction motion; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nos. 2019AP65 2019AP66 5 Scott argues that the circuit court erred by denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249795 - 2019-11-05
. Nos. 2019AP65 2019AP66 5 Scott argues that the circuit court erred by denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249795 - 2019-11-05
State v. Katrina French
erred in finding her competent and in denying her motions seeking to suppress statements she made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6187 - 2005-03-31
erred in finding her competent and in denying her motions seeking to suppress statements she made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6187 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Isace A. Whiting
for possession of methamphetamine. Whiting claims the circuit court erred by not granting his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5415 - 2017-09-19
for possession of methamphetamine. Whiting claims the circuit court erred by not granting his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5415 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel J. Marinko, Sr.
argues that: (1) the trial court erred by denying his motion to change the trial venue; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4904 - 2005-03-31
argues that: (1) the trial court erred by denying his motion to change the trial venue; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4904 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Floyd L. Marlow
that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied a motion to sever his trial from a codefendant’s; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6825 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court erred when it: (1) denied a motion to sever his trial from a codefendant’s; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6825 - 2017-09-20
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
offense, contrary to §§ 161.41(3m) and 161.48, Stats. Lamont contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
offense, contrary to §§ 161.41(3m) and 161.48, Stats. Lamont contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Henry Balsewicz
) the nunc pro tunc competency hearing was not meaningful or adequate; (3) the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5253 - 2017-09-19
) the nunc pro tunc competency hearing was not meaningful or adequate; (3) the trial court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5253 - 2017-09-19
State v. Shuron C. Davis
was ineffective when he advised him not to testify at trial; (2) the trial court erred when it denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4789 - 2005-03-31
was ineffective when he advised him not to testify at trial; (2) the trial court erred when it denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4789 - 2005-03-31
Mark R. Hoerman v. Employe Trust Funds Board
that the board erred in: (1) concluding that the officers’ principal job duties did not involve active law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10847 - 2005-03-31
that the board erred in: (1) concluding that the officers’ principal job duties did not involve active law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10847 - 2005-03-31