Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 12873 for se.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 12873 for se.
State v. James M. Moran
. § 974.07 (2001-02),[2] enacted by the legislature in 2001. ¶2 We granted Moran's pro se petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18971 - 2005-07-11
. § 974.07 (2001-02),[2] enacted by the legislature in 2001. ¶2 We granted Moran's pro se petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18971 - 2005-07-11
Marvin Coleman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
that Coleman has made no showing of why he failed to attempt to bring his concerns before a court on a pro se
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25212 - 2006-05-17
that Coleman has made no showing of why he failed to attempt to bring his concerns before a court on a pro se
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25212 - 2006-05-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). No. 2020AP1522-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Darrell Smith, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490523 - 2022-03-03
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). No. 2020AP1522-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Darrell Smith, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490523 - 2022-03-03
[PDF]
Marvin Coleman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
a court on a pro se basis, as so many incarcerated persons have. ¶33 Coleman does not dispute any
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25212 - 2017-09-21
a court on a pro se basis, as so many incarcerated persons have. ¶33 Coleman does not dispute any
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25212 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kenneth J. Kraemer, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109724 - 2014-03-31
., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kenneth J. Kraemer, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109724 - 2014-03-31
CA Blank Order
appeals pro se from a September 4, 2012 order denying his motion to reconsider a July 15, 2011 decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96330 - 2013-05-07
appeals pro se from a September 4, 2012 order denying his motion to reconsider a July 15, 2011 decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96330 - 2013-05-07
[PDF]
State v. Anthony M. Printup
County, Minnesota, on February 11, 1999. Printup appeared pro se in both Minnesota cases. At his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7672 - 2017-09-19
County, Minnesota, on February 11, 1999. Printup appeared pro se in both Minnesota cases. At his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7672 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gary Malkmus
Lac sentence. ¶3 On August 1, 2000, Malkmus filed pro se a motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3737 - 2005-03-31
Lac sentence. ¶3 On August 1, 2000, Malkmus filed pro se a motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Stephen Klatt appeals pro se an order denying his “Motion for Resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85597 - 2014-09-15
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Stephen Klatt appeals pro se an order denying his “Motion for Resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85597 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pro se from an order dismissing their action against the Village of Big Bend. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185205 - 2017-09-21
pro se from an order dismissing their action against the Village of Big Bend. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185205 - 2017-09-21