Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 6141 for sheriff.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 6141 for sheriff.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Sheriff’s Department lieutenant Jeffrey Schaub testified as follows. On February 14, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271439 - 2020-07-21
Sheriff’s Department lieutenant Jeffrey Schaub testified as follows. On February 14, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271439 - 2020-07-21
[PDF]
State v. David W. Stokes
, hearing to suppress statements and other evidence, sheriff's officers testified that they attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7897 - 2017-09-19
, hearing to suppress statements and other evidence, sheriff's officers testified that they attempted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7897 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sheriff assigned to freeway traffic enforcement noticed a vehicle (later identified as being driven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29
sheriff assigned to freeway traffic enforcement noticed a vehicle (later identified as being driven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there were other people in house. To establish that Pipes was the one conducting the transactions, sheriff
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107905 - 2017-09-21
, there were other people in house. To establish that Pipes was the one conducting the transactions, sheriff
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are internally inconsistent. On March 24, 2003, L.W. stated to a sheriff’s department investigator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143340 - 2017-09-21
are internally inconsistent. On March 24, 2003, L.W. stated to a sheriff’s department investigator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143340 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
, “No, don’t do it.” Before Fitch could respond, the sheriff took him away because the proceedings were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4719 - 2017-09-19
, “No, don’t do it.” Before Fitch could respond, the sheriff took him away because the proceedings were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
external hard drives during the execution of a search warrant at Christensen’s home. A sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353412 - 2021-04-06
external hard drives during the execution of a search warrant at Christensen’s home. A sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353412 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Glenn C. Kimpel
disagree and affirm the judgment. ¶2 The facts are not in dispute. Jefferson County Sheriff’s Deputies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16068 - 2017-09-21
disagree and affirm the judgment. ¶2 The facts are not in dispute. Jefferson County Sheriff’s Deputies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16068 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bradley D. Muck
. On March 24, 2002, Muck was arrested by an Ozaukee County Sheriff’s Deputy for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31
. On March 24, 2002, Muck was arrested by an Ozaukee County Sheriff’s Deputy for operating a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to investigate a report of “possible parties” at a boat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28648 - 2007-04-04
County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to investigate a report of “possible parties” at a boat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28648 - 2007-04-04