Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 19294 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 19294 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
made in the affidavit supporting the warrant application were true. Consequently, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
made in the affidavit supporting the warrant application were true. Consequently, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Susan L. Schuster
be reinstated by the Supreme Court upon the filing of an affidavit with the director showing full compliance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16799 - 2017-09-21
be reinstated by the Supreme Court upon the filing of an affidavit with the director showing full compliance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16799 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thermond Larry III
by not suppressing evidence gathered pursuant to a search warrant obtained with an affidavit he asserts contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12992 - 2005-03-31
by not suppressing evidence gathered pursuant to a search warrant obtained with an affidavit he asserts contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12992 - 2005-03-31
John T. Morris v. Juneau County
in their pleadings, we need not determine whether Ms. Morris’ affidavit, filed after the County’s motion for summary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
in their pleadings, we need not determine whether Ms. Morris’ affidavit, filed after the County’s motion for summary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John T. Morris v. Juneau County
whether Ms. Morris’ affidavit, filed after the No. 96-2507 2 County’s motion for summary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17149 - 2017-09-21
whether Ms. Morris’ affidavit, filed after the No. 96-2507 2 County’s motion for summary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17149 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the victim had recanted his allegations against Arnold. Arnold offered the victim’s November 2011 affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134640 - 2015-02-10
the victim had recanted his allegations against Arnold. Arnold offered the victim’s November 2011 affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134640 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
by affidavit and citation to any relevant portions of the record that he or she did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51517 - 2014-09-15
by affidavit and citation to any relevant portions of the record that he or she did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51517 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Duane Flesch v. Charles Wranosky
statutory requirements. He also argues that the affidavits should not be considered because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12146 - 2017-09-21
statutory requirements. He also argues that the affidavits should not be considered because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12146 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by Goeckner’s affidavit in which he swore that the last time he treated Carstensen was late July 2003. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95277 - 2013-06-09
by Goeckner’s affidavit in which he swore that the last time he treated Carstensen was late July 2003. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95277 - 2013-06-09
Alton B. Ison, Jr. v. Lucille V. Nefstead
of the driveway where it turns to the east.[2] Nefstead argues that the affidavit of her predecessor in title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14562 - 2005-03-31
of the driveway where it turns to the east.[2] Nefstead argues that the affidavit of her predecessor in title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14562 - 2005-03-31