Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38501 - 38510 of 57358 for id.

[PDF] NOTICE
in the trial court by postconviction motion; they had been preserved for appeal. See id. Harris’s criticism
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28386 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the surcharge is not punishment and is not a direct consequence of the plea. Id., ¶12. Based on Freiboth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218715 - 2018-09-12

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
but not known to the trial judge at the time of the original sentencing. Id., ¶40. Whether a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98998 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Donald A. Bratrud
. By accepting the plea, the court adjudicated that fact. Id. In Commonwealth v. Mull, the only proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10082 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Dionysus J. Thomas
the accused bargained.” Id., ¶14 (citations omitted). It is well-settled that the “State may not accomplish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20516 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
protection. Id. Here, the trial court’s sentence was based on relevant facts and proper considerations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102447 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
performance. See id. at 694 (holding that to prove prejudice, a defendant must establish
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240422 - 2019-05-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
whether the evidence is direct or circumstantial. Id. As relevant to this appeal, the State charged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901358 - 2025-01-22

COURT OF APPEALS
). Counsel’s strategic choices, if made with knowledge of the facts and law are virtually unchallengeable. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31404 - 2008-01-07

State v. Robert K.
subject to our de novo review. Id., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d at 669, 607 N.W.2d at 929. Time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7640 - 2005-03-31