Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38521 - 38530 of 62363 for child support.
Search results 38521 - 38530 of 62363 for child support.
State v. Todd Jerovetz
conviction is: 10 yrs. and a $10,000 fine.” ¶9 The prosecutor’s arguments in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5356 - 2005-03-31
conviction is: 10 yrs. and a $10,000 fine.” ¶9 The prosecutor’s arguments in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5356 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). Murphy fails to develop her argument related to § 244.16 legally or to support it factually, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027802 - 2025-10-23
). Murphy fails to develop her argument related to § 244.16 legally or to support it factually, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027802 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
Sammy J. Gates v. Gary R. McCaughtry
McCaughtry’s affidavit in support of the defense motion for summary judgment. ¶3 McCaughtry is the warden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5983 - 2017-09-19
McCaughtry’s affidavit in support of the defense motion for summary judgment. ¶3 McCaughtry is the warden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5983 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, are common traffic occurrences insufficient to support reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75147 - 2014-09-15
, are common traffic occurrences insufficient to support reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75147 - 2014-09-15
State v. Theiss L. Coleman
court denied his motions to suppress evidence. Coleman argues that the facts do not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2461 - 2005-03-31
court denied his motions to suppress evidence. Coleman argues that the facts do not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2461 - 2005-03-31
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77801 - 2012-02-05
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77801 - 2012-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict; (2) whether the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270931 - 2020-07-21
there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict; (2) whether the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270931 - 2020-07-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
existed to support McMullen’s plea. We are satisfied that the plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
existed to support McMullen’s plea. We are satisfied that the plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
of the statute. This argument has no support in the case law interpreting and applying the statute. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
of the statute. This argument has no support in the case law interpreting and applying the statute. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Boris Ouchakof
report and the referee's report supporting Ouchakof's petition for consensual revocation of his license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16609 - 2005-03-31
report and the referee's report supporting Ouchakof's petition for consensual revocation of his license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16609 - 2005-03-31