Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38521 - 38530 of 41602 for she.
Search results 38521 - 38530 of 41602 for she.
[PDF]
State v. Earl L. Diehl
)(a), STATS., or other mandatory duties, and must allege he or she did not in fact know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9626 - 2017-09-19
)(a), STATS., or other mandatory duties, and must allege he or she did not in fact know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9626 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
that the Elam mandate clear. Where a defendant satisfies all three factors, he or she ordinarily is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
that the Elam mandate clear. Where a defendant satisfies all three factors, he or she ordinarily is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12769 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Elizabeth made it clear throughout the circuit court proceedings that she believed there were no assets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143756 - 2015-06-29
. Elizabeth made it clear throughout the circuit court proceedings that she believed there were no assets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143756 - 2015-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
demonstrate that “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he [or she] would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101510 - 2013-09-03
demonstrate that “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he [or she] would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101510 - 2013-09-03
State v. Vincent C. Lewis
she failed to request a separate “while armed” instruction for the charge of first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5598 - 2005-03-31
she failed to request a separate “while armed” instruction for the charge of first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5598 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. Winkel
J.T. and Attorney Winkel's associate that she had determined that J.T. was eligible for benefits
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20615 - 2017-09-21
J.T. and Attorney Winkel's associate that she had determined that J.T. was eligible for benefits
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20615 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
show both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that he or she was prejudiced by the deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
show both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that he or she was prejudiced by the deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
State v. Arturo Perez
so serious that he or she was not functioning as the "counsel" guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8388 - 2005-03-31
so serious that he or she was not functioning as the "counsel" guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8388 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
by the insured that he or she “was probably negligent” that “that is confidential information that should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15541 - 2005-03-31
by the insured that he or she “was probably negligent” that “that is confidential information that should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15541 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
otherwise noted. [2] “Unwitting” is a term used by police when the individual does not realize he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32109 - 2008-03-17
otherwise noted. [2] “Unwitting” is a term used by police when the individual does not realize he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32109 - 2008-03-17