Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38541 - 38550 of 58458 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
appeals from a judgment, following a jury trial, convicting him of attempted first-degree intentional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738220 - 2024-01-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163025 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
the case for a new trial: (1) the circuit No. 2006AP2977-CR 2 court erred by permitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32170 - 2014-09-15

Thomas Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Board of Zoning Appeals
appeals from a trial court order directing the Board to hold a hearing on Thomas and Jami Tateokas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12657 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Timothy Conant v. Physicians Plus Medical Group, Inc.
her work hours to care for him. 1 The trial court granted summary judgment against the Conants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14787 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rupena's, Inc. v. City of West Allis
). Because we agree with the trial court that more of the factors used to determine who is the beneficial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2271 - 2017-09-19

Richland Valley Products, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Casualty Company
. of Milwaukee. Orally argued by Paul F. Heaton. Brief of Amicus Curiae, Civil Trial Counsel of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7959 - 2005-03-31

Rupena's, Inc. v. City of West Allis
improvement, and therefore is taxable under Wis. Stat. ยง 70.17(1). Because we agree with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2271 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 3 & 4, 2007
violations in a complaint filed in Milwaukee County Circuit Court on July 30, 2003. The trial court ruled
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30454 - 2014-09-15

Cindy L. Grothe v. Valley Coatings, Inc.
a summary judgment we apply the same methodology as the trial court, and we consider the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2306 - 2005-03-31