Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38551 - 38560 of 68277 for did.
Search results 38551 - 38560 of 68277 for did.
2006 WI 127
: Dissented: Not Participating: ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27207 - 2006-11-19
: Dissented: Not Participating: ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27207 - 2006-11-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Postconviction, Melenciano moved to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27635 - 2014-09-15
. Postconviction, Melenciano moved to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not inform him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27635 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was incompetent two months earlier. He did not offer into evidence a transcript of the plea hearing, or testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29758 - 2010-09-22
was incompetent two months earlier. He did not offer into evidence a transcript of the plea hearing, or testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29758 - 2010-09-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 3, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Ap...
of extended supervision. Postconviction, Melenciano moved to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27635 - 2015-04-15
of extended supervision. Postconviction, Melenciano moved to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27635 - 2015-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm. Although the respondent in this appeal did not file a brief, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679858 - 2023-07-20
. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm. Although the respondent in this appeal did not file a brief, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679858 - 2023-07-20
State v. Walter B. Cowan
omissions as failure to object to inadmissible hearsay at trial and at sentencing. However, the motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7800 - 2012-12-10
omissions as failure to object to inadmissible hearsay at trial and at sentencing. However, the motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7800 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Michael Storzer
Storzer as a pedophile. The court acknowledged that the record did not support its characterization
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2393 - 2017-09-19
Storzer as a pedophile. The court acknowledged that the record did not support its characterization
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2393 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he was prejudiced by counsel’s claimed failure because Skelly did not have sufficient time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227215 - 2018-11-14
that he was prejudiced by counsel’s claimed failure because Skelly did not have sufficient time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227215 - 2018-11-14
2010 WI APP 101
did not err as a matter of law. Because Tim’s challenge on appeal hinges on this single issue, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52686 - 2010-08-24
did not err as a matter of law. Because Tim’s challenge on appeal hinges on this single issue, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52686 - 2010-08-24
State v. Thomas W. Reimann
the retroactivity issue during trial. We assume he does so because he did not raise the issue in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8133 - 2005-03-31
the retroactivity issue during trial. We assume he does so because he did not raise the issue in the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8133 - 2005-03-31