Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38551 - 38560 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] NOTICE
the case for a new trial: (1) the circuit No. 2006AP2977-CR 2 court erred by permitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32170 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. Gonzalez offers five grounds for reversing the conviction and remanding the case for a new trial: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19

[PDF] The Falk Corporation v. Basil E. Ryan, Jr.
, 1995). Suffice it to say, our decision affirmed a trial court judgment in a declaratory judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5712 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Christopher Johnson
affirmed in part and reversed in part. Cause remanded with directions to the trial court to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8743 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Thomas Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Board of Zoning Appeals
. The City of Waukesha Board of Zoning Appeals appeals from a trial court order directing the Board to hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12657 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
after revocation. At the instigation of trial counsel, the circuit court in case No. 2009CF2574 agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92604 - 2013-02-04

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 30, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
consent law. ΒΆ2 Roberts contends that: (1) the trial court erred in concluding that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66885 - 2011-06-29

William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
disability retirement benefits, appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8488 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
trial, Blanchard moved the circuit court to admit, and to allow cross-examination of E.U. about, one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270025 - 2020-07-16

Dustin Dowhower v. Simon Marquez
a judgment from the trial court declaring unenforceable the reducing clause provision in the UIM policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3976 - 2005-03-31