Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38561 - 38570 of 56136 for so.
Search results 38561 - 38570 of 56136 for so.
[PDF]
Supreme Court Statistics July 2024
the opportunity to do so. This type of request is typically made when the Court of Appeals believes
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838227 - 2024-09-10
the opportunity to do so. This type of request is typically made when the Court of Appeals believes
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838227 - 2024-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
to a direct appeal. Webb previously had a direct appeal, so Rule 809.30 is inapplicable. Although neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41230 - 2009-09-21
to a direct appeal. Webb previously had a direct appeal, so Rule 809.30 is inapplicable. Although neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41230 - 2009-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
basis whether a particular proposal is “primarily related” to the conditions of employment so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26772 - 2006-10-18
basis whether a particular proposal is “primarily related” to the conditions of employment so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26772 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
fails to do so here. Parties must support their legal arguments “with citations to the authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827360 - 2024-07-17
fails to do so here. Parties must support their legal arguments “with citations to the authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827360 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
State v. Thomas R. Kinnaman
that arrested him did not have probable cause to do so, and therefore he did not violate the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10903 - 2017-09-20
that arrested him did not have probable cause to do so, and therefore he did not violate the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10903 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Edwin D. Moehagen v. City of Chippewa Falls
uniformity may sometimes answer a reasonableness challenge, it does not do so where, as here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2767 - 2017-09-19
uniformity may sometimes answer a reasonableness challenge, it does not do so where, as here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2767 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County “to so note the dismissal of [Przytarski]’s claims in the Circuit Court Access Project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65110 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County “to so note the dismissal of [Przytarski]’s claims in the Circuit Court Access Project
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65110 - 2014-09-15
Harrison M. Marcum v. Donald Gudmanson
provides only that an inmate “may” seek such an appeal, not that the inmate “shall” do so. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11777 - 2005-03-31
provides only that an inmate “may” seek such an appeal, not that the inmate “shall” do so. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11777 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion, and it was reasonable in the circumstances to ask Brandl to move up slightly so that the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123386 - 2014-10-08
suspicion, and it was reasonable in the circumstances to ask Brandl to move up slightly so that the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123386 - 2014-10-08
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion and has failed to offer a sufficient reason for failing to do so. State v. Escalona
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93581 - 2013-03-05
postconviction motion and has failed to offer a sufficient reason for failing to do so. State v. Escalona
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93581 - 2013-03-05