Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38581 - 38590 of 63933 for records/1000.
Search results 38581 - 38590 of 63933 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
was not considered by the Commission and is not a part of the certified record. Therefore, it cannot serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49112 - 2010-04-19
was not considered by the Commission and is not a part of the certified record. Therefore, it cannot serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49112 - 2010-04-19
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106405 - 2014-01-05
review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106405 - 2014-01-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the record as required under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d)-(e). In the argument section of her brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=805638 - 2024-05-22
to the record as required under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d)-(e). In the argument section of her brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=805638 - 2024-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion when it divided the parties’ property equally. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698623 - 2023-09-06
discretion when it divided the parties’ property equally. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698623 - 2023-09-06
State v. James D. Krause
this court may examine the record to determine whether facts exist which support the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
this court may examine the record to determine whether facts exist which support the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lorne Demars
an understanding and an admission in the record. Id. ¶10 Here, as in Rachwal, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4011 - 2005-03-31
an understanding and an admission in the record. Id. ¶10 Here, as in Rachwal, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4011 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Binta Njai v. Ray Lang
there is no explanation for the change in the record, we assume Njai became aware of the later address at some point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3880 - 2017-09-20
there is no explanation for the change in the record, we assume Njai became aware of the later address at some point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3880 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
Simonson alleges the following facts (though, we note, without adequately citing the record; we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32507 - 2014-09-15
Simonson alleges the following facts (though, we note, without adequately citing the record; we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32507 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the Offender Records Assistant at Dodge Correctional Institution notified the court that “the longest period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34497 - 2014-09-15
the Offender Records Assistant at Dodge Correctional Institution notified the court that “the longest period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34497 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott F. Strerath
contention that Exhibit 2 should not have been admitted into evidence because the trial record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2645 - 2017-09-19
contention that Exhibit 2 should not have been admitted into evidence because the trial record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2645 - 2017-09-19