Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38591 - 38600 of 49958 for our.
Search results 38591 - 38600 of 49958 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Rueben Gantt
in Texas, where Ratashia was living. But in our opinion, that does not rule out concurrent jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9642 - 2017-09-19
in Texas, where Ratashia was living. But in our opinion, that does not rule out concurrent jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9642 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dayon R. Walker
subject to our de novo review. Id. Among the factors we consider in determining the voluntariness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5071 - 2017-09-19
subject to our de novo review. Id. Among the factors we consider in determining the voluntariness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5071 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a challenge of Potts’s sentences. Our independent review of the record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
be no arguable merit to a challenge of Potts’s sentences. Our independent review of the record discloses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760430 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the mandatory minimum sentence was unconstitutional as applied. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709693 - 2023-10-04
, the mandatory minimum sentence was unconstitutional as applied. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709693 - 2023-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order denying his motion for a new trial. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362923 - 2021-05-04
order denying his motion for a new trial. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362923 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105521 - 2017-09-21
for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of Meier’s additional assertions have not been addressed by our prior analysis, they are deemed rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27340 - 2014-09-15
of Meier’s additional assertions have not been addressed by our prior analysis, they are deemed rejected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27340 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
will be present on the property on June 27, 2011, to comply with our proposed Order of May 24, 2011.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108965 - 2014-03-10
will be present on the property on June 27, 2011, to comply with our proposed Order of May 24, 2011.” After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108965 - 2014-03-10
State v. Sally S.
if there is sufficient evidence to support the trial court's decision. Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9245 - 2005-03-31
if there is sufficient evidence to support the trial court's decision. Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9245 - 2005-03-31