Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3861 - 3870 of 24774 for extending.
Search results 3861 - 3870 of 24774 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to eighteen months of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision for the 2011 identify theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123855 - 2017-09-21
to eighteen months of initial confinement and two years of extended supervision for the 2011 identify theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
months’ extended supervision. On appeal, Schuman argues that, because of his autism diagnosis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709693 - 2023-10-04
months’ extended supervision. On appeal, Schuman argues that, because of his autism diagnosis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709693 - 2023-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
fifteen years of initial confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision. At sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513064 - 2022-04-27
fifteen years of initial confinement followed by ten years of extended supervision. At sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513064 - 2022-04-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
until January 11, 2022, when he was released to extended supervision. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065624 - 2026-01-21
until January 11, 2022, when he was released to extended supervision. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1065624 - 2026-01-21
Michael Kielblock v. Hytec Manufacturing, Inc.
the circuit court denied a motion to extend the time for filing a proper answer, effectively striking Hytec’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6761 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court denied a motion to extend the time for filing a proper answer, effectively striking Hytec’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
unspecified initial confinement with 3 years extended supervision to follow. The State also will not take
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
unspecified initial confinement with 3 years extended supervision to follow. The State also will not take
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and eighteen months’ extended supervision, reiterating the restitution obligation. This matter is before us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91978 - 2014-09-15
and eighteen months’ extended supervision, reiterating the restitution obligation. This matter is before us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91978 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by three years’ extended supervision on the child pornography count, with an unspecified concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10
by three years’ extended supervision on the child pornography count, with an unspecified concurrent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609460 - 2023-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of incarceration, consisting of six or seven years of initial confinement and the balance on extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413346 - 2021-08-24
of incarceration, consisting of six or seven years of initial confinement and the balance on extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413346 - 2021-08-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
months of initial confinement and thirty-six months of extended supervision, to be served consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194127 - 2017-09-21
months of initial confinement and thirty-six months of extended supervision, to be served consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194127 - 2017-09-21