Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3861 - 3870 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.

State v. Jeffrey Krohn
not have the authority to consent to the search of his property because the case law permits third-party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14817 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
after the search of Copeland’s car but during the pendency of his case.[3] The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98391 - 2013-06-25

State v. Nathan Speers
; the officers were available in case any disruptions broke out as patrons waited to be searched and admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17730 - 2005-05-02

[PDF] State v. Nathan Speers
available in case any disruptions broke out as patrons waited to be searched and admitted to the concert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17730 - 2017-09-21

State v. Patrick E. Richter
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1332-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14001 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Patrick E. Richter
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1332-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14001 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not result from simple harm to the opposing party’s case. Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d at 789-90. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74264 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 19
. 2d 726, ¶7. The Search of Keller’s Computer was a Probationary Search ¶8 The issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183522 - 2018-02-13

Frontsheet
The question presented in this case is whether the warrantless probation search of Purtell's computer violated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118829 - 2014-07-31

State v. Nathan T. Moore
that the search in this case was more of the same. Undoubtedly, Baldukas’ routine procedure might well offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31