Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38601 - 38610 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 38601 - 38610 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258584 - 2020-04-21
postconviction motion. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258584 - 2020-04-21
Carl W. Rady v. Nancy Bergstrom
to dismiss, and the court heard the motion by telephone. Rady did not participate. The motion was granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10038 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss, and the court heard the motion by telephone. Rady did not participate. The motion was granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10038 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
deadlines to permit the filing of a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). A no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040084 - 2025-11-17
deadlines to permit the filing of a postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). A no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040084 - 2025-11-17
State v. Michael A. Decker
court erred by denying his motion to exclude from evidence the results of an Intoximeter EC/IR breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7260 - 2005-03-31
court erred by denying his motion to exclude from evidence the results of an Intoximeter EC/IR breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7260 - 2005-03-31
Lisa J. Brown v. MR Group, LLC
)(a) provides, in pertinent part: Every pleading, motion or other paper of a party represented by an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6815 - 2005-03-31
)(a) provides, in pertinent part: Every pleading, motion or other paper of a party represented by an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6815 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dillis V. Allen
the State under WIS. STAT. ch. 804. 2 In response to Allen’s discovery demands, the State filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3605 - 2017-09-19
the State under WIS. STAT. ch. 804. 2 In response to Allen’s discovery demands, the State filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3605 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the pleas. Shortly thereafter, a public defender appointed on Rose’s behalf filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33344 - 2014-09-15
the pleas. Shortly thereafter, a public defender appointed on Rose’s behalf filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied Alston’s motion for resentencing. Alston contends that he was denied his due process right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234534 - 2019-02-07
that denied Alston’s motion for resentencing. Alston contends that he was denied his due process right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234534 - 2019-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. 1 James asserts that it was a due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196687 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. 1 James asserts that it was a due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196687 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the vehicle. Moustafa argues that the circuit court erred by denying her motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848277 - 2024-09-10
in the vehicle. Moustafa argues that the circuit court erred by denying her motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848277 - 2024-09-10