Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38611 - 38620 of 44730 for part.
Search results 38611 - 38620 of 44730 for part.
Elizabeth Blum v. Board of Education
is declared to be an essential function of a representative government and an integral part of the routine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10549 - 2005-03-31
is declared to be an essential function of a representative government and an integral part of the routine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10549 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph D. Armstrong
that the hair evidence used by the State during trial played little or no part in the jury’s verdict.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5861 - 2005-03-31
that the hair evidence used by the State during trial played little or no part in the jury’s verdict.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5861 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in effect. For the most part, Tran has refused sexual offender treatment. Even were there no treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61789 - 2011-03-29
in effect. For the most part, Tran has refused sexual offender treatment. Even were there no treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61789 - 2011-03-29
State v. Ronald L. Ragan
of candidacy. This declaration recited in relevant part: “I have not been convicted of any infamous crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
of candidacy. This declaration recited in relevant part: “I have not been convicted of any infamous crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the manner in which the court handled the objection as part of our objective bias analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993175 - 2025-08-05
the manner in which the court handled the objection as part of our objective bias analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993175 - 2025-08-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. Part of the rationale for our holding was the observation that the changes to the law did not bar Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116170 - 2014-07-02
. Part of the rationale for our holding was the observation that the changes to the law did not bar Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116170 - 2014-07-02
State v. Angelia D.B.
enforcement official. While the T.L.O. Court adopted the less stringent reasonable grounds standard in part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17070 - 2005-03-31
enforcement official. While the T.L.O. Court adopted the less stringent reasonable grounds standard in part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. C.
. Section 908.045(6) provides, in relevant part: 908.045 Hearsay exceptions; declarant unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12352 - 2017-09-21
. Section 908.045(6) provides, in relevant part: 908.045 Hearsay exceptions; declarant unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12352 - 2017-09-21
State v. Xiong Yang
(1985). Section 885.37(1)(b) provides in part: If a court has notice that a person [charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8705 - 2005-03-31
(1985). Section 885.37(1)(b) provides in part: If a court has notice that a person [charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8705 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 14
in relevant part: “I know there is a [Board] hearing tomorrow and based on our discussion if the [Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622328 - 2023-04-06
in relevant part: “I know there is a [Board] hearing tomorrow and based on our discussion if the [Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622328 - 2023-04-06