Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38621 - 38630 of 83951 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 38621 - 38630 of 83951 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Kendrick C. East III
a postconviction motion on October 29, 2002, claiming that the case should be dismissed for noncompliance with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6365 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction motion on October 29, 2002, claiming that the case should be dismissed for noncompliance with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6365 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties’ affidavits and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82287 - 2012-05-09
the parties’ affidavits and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82287 - 2012-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Deborah J. Burch
, as Burch appears to suggest, that the facts in this case be as “egregious” as those in other reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2478 - 2017-09-19
, as Burch appears to suggest, that the facts in this case be as “egregious” as those in other reported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2478 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State charged Long with OWI-tenth, that case was dismissed after the preliminary hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651823 - 2023-05-03
the State charged Long with OWI-tenth, that case was dismissed after the preliminary hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651823 - 2023-05-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Morrow’s arguments and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the case was due primarily to (1) the unavailability of a state witness; and (2) the fact that Whitelow’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149305 - 2017-09-21
the case was due primarily to (1) the unavailability of a state witness; and (2) the fact that Whitelow’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149305 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the State rested its case, Nelson thrice confirmed her desire to testify on her own behalf. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101620 - 2013-09-03
the State rested its case, Nelson thrice confirmed her desire to testify on her own behalf. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101620 - 2013-09-03
State v. Robert J. DeFliger
there was any kind of conversation between them about the case. The court stated that it did not think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
there was any kind of conversation between them about the case. The court stated that it did not think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
Cottonseed, LLC v. Brian Coulthard
Cotton under the circumstances of this case. Riley Cotton then filed a cross-complaint against American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26097 - 2006-08-02
Cotton under the circumstances of this case. Riley Cotton then filed a cross-complaint against American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26097 - 2006-08-02
State v. D.L.S.
in attempting to prove this case.” The second statement, made during closing arguments as the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31
in attempting to prove this case.” The second statement, made during closing arguments as the guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6125 - 2005-03-31