Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38631 - 38640 of 68502 for did.
Search results 38631 - 38640 of 68502 for did.
State v. Ricki D. Bunnell
the first test was under the prohibited blood alcohol concentration. However, our decision did not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12086 - 2005-03-31
the first test was under the prohibited blood alcohol concentration. However, our decision did not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12086 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
overlooked the fact that the Department of Corrections recommended concurrent sentences, and that they did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433154 - 2021-09-30
overlooked the fact that the Department of Corrections recommended concurrent sentences, and that they did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433154 - 2021-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
was incompetent two months earlier. He did not offer into evidence a transcript of the plea hearing, or testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29758 - 2007-07-18
was incompetent two months earlier. He did not offer into evidence a transcript of the plea hearing, or testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29758 - 2007-07-18
Great West Casualty Company, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
: Crooks, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the defendant/plaintiff-respondent-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16928 - 2005-03-31
: Crooks, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the defendant/plaintiff-respondent-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16928 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lee M. Henrickson
N.W.2d 411. We conclude the trial court did not err and we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4812 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 411. We conclude the trial court did not err and we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4812 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ferdinand Walters
). Walters contends that: (1) the trial court did not consider his motion on its merits; and (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10796 - 2005-03-31
). Walters contends that: (1) the trial court did not consider his motion on its merits; and (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lee M. Henrickson
Wis. 2d 881, 637 N.W.2d 411. We conclude the trial court did not err and we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4812 - 2017-09-20
Wis. 2d 881, 637 N.W.2d 411. We conclude the trial court did not err and we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4812 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Hiram Johnson
did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, this court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11192 - 2017-09-19
did not erroneously exercise its sentencing discretion, this court affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11192 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph McGowan
days credit than previously awarded. We conclude, as did the trial court, that McGowan has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5666 - 2005-03-31
days credit than previously awarded. We conclude, as did the trial court, that McGowan has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
be followed.” Id. ¶4 Rogers argues that his attorney was ineffective because he did not raise the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53420 - 2014-09-15
be followed.” Id. ¶4 Rogers argues that his attorney was ineffective because he did not raise the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53420 - 2014-09-15