Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38661 - 38670 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 38661 - 38670 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He contends that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35903 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He contends that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35903 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sauk County v. Robert M. Engelhardt
opinion that the blood test would not “be much different.” The trial court denied Engelhardt’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14476 - 2017-09-21
opinion that the blood test would not “be much different.” The trial court denied Engelhardt’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14476 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Miller argues he was entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56771 - 2014-09-15
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Miller argues he was entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56771 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Curtis W.Ross
was ineffective for failing to file a motion for substitution of judge. We reject his contentions. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16126 - 2017-09-21
was ineffective for failing to file a motion for substitution of judge. We reject his contentions. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16126 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
indicated that a hearing on the default judgment motion was set for January 14, 2021. On that date
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=820224 - 2024-07-02
indicated that a hearing on the default judgment motion was set for January 14, 2021. On that date
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=820224 - 2024-07-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
statement as ordered by the court. Mendez filed a motion for contempt which was heard before Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55525 - 2014-09-15
statement as ordered by the court. Mendez filed a motion for contempt which was heard before Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55525 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jones contends that his trial and sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109391 - 2014-03-25
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Jones contends that his trial and sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109391 - 2014-03-25
[PDF]
WI APP 112
of the property. Trimble appeals. ¶3 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33061 - 2014-09-15
of the property. Trimble appeals. ¶3 We review a motion for summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33061 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Mudrak argues that a legislative change that reduced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840522 - 2024-08-20
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Mudrak argues that a legislative change that reduced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840522 - 2024-08-20
Frontsheet
Steinhafel. The referee granted that motion. ¶15 Attorney Steinhafel failed to appear for a scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104868 - 2013-11-25
Steinhafel. The referee granted that motion. ¶15 Attorney Steinhafel failed to appear for a scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104868 - 2013-11-25