Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38671 - 38680 of 84745 for case number.
Search results 38671 - 38680 of 84745 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS
lacked competency to decide the motion because the record in Smith’s underlying case was in the appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32894 - 2008-06-02
lacked competency to decide the motion because the record in Smith’s underlying case was in the appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32894 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2020AP1703-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489373 - 2022-03-02
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2020AP1703-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489373 - 2022-03-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of exposing genitals to a child in this case and an amended charge in Oconto County Circuit Court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104267 - 2017-09-21
of exposing genitals to a child in this case and an amended charge in Oconto County Circuit Court case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Circuit Court case No. 2017CM4157, Lagerman was charged with disorderly conduct, battery, possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532418 - 2022-06-14
Circuit Court case No. 2017CM4157, Lagerman was charged with disorderly conduct, battery, possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532418 - 2022-06-14
State v. Gary Bryant
.[1] We affirm. I. This case was plea bargained. In May of 1996, Bryant, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12276 - 2005-03-31
.[1] We affirm. I. This case was plea bargained. In May of 1996, Bryant, who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12276 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court lacked competency to decide the motion because the record in Smith’s underlying case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32894 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court lacked competency to decide the motion because the record in Smith’s underlying case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32894 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.[1] See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137252 - 2015-03-09
of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.[1] See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137252 - 2015-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 In this case, Chippewa County case No. 2002CF8, the court sentenced Bleskacek in 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50567 - 2010-06-01
. ¶2 In this case, Chippewa County case No. 2002CF8, the court sentenced Bleskacek in 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50567 - 2010-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645443 - 2023-04-19
2 that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645443 - 2023-04-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
In this case, Chippewa County case No. 2002CF8, the court sentenced Bleskacek in 2002 to seven years’ initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50567 - 2014-09-15
In this case, Chippewa County case No. 2002CF8, the court sentenced Bleskacek in 2002 to seven years’ initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50567 - 2014-09-15