Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38671 - 38680 of 62360 for child support.

[PDF] State v. Martin Patterson
not expressly made a finding necessary to support its legal conclusion, this court can assume that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10235 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
are supported by the later proceedings at the sentencing hearing when he again admitted to the repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] City of La Crosse v. Neil Collins
the legal question is intertwined with factual findings supporting that conclusion, we give weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13137 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that Boose was “not attempting to reconstruct the record but rather to obtain evidence in support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189593 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
of any case or statutory authority that appears to support counsel’s conclusions. Id. See also McCoy v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97439 - 2013-05-28

COURT OF APPEALS
, and was facing backwards to determine whether anyone was following him. Reasonable suspicion therefore supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61224 - 2011-03-14

COURT OF APPEALS
a jury verdict if there is any credible evidence to support it.” Radford v. J.J.B. Enters., Ltd., 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138330 - 2015-03-31

_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
, except to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77801 - 2015-05-13

State v. Jason D. VanStraten
insufficient evidence to support the charge. The State indicated a willingness to introduce further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6604 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael C. Cull
. An appellate court will search the record for evidence that supports the trial court’s factual findings. In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13225 - 2005-03-31