Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38681 - 38690 of 70033 for hi.
Search results 38681 - 38690 of 70033 for hi.
CA Blank Order
the block looking for Smith, saw Smith in a parking lot, and “tried to ram” Smith with his vehicle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132312 - 2013-04-22
the block looking for Smith, saw Smith in a parking lot, and “tried to ram” Smith with his vehicle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132312 - 2013-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
been involved in a homicide. Bohanan contends that the evidentiary errors denied him his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06
been involved in a homicide. Bohanan contends that the evidentiary errors denied him his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
, McCredie argues that there is no legal basis for his conviction as the victim consented to sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60426 - 2011-03-01
, McCredie argues that there is no legal basis for his conviction as the victim consented to sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60426 - 2011-03-01
State v. Matthew Edwin Voigt
vehicle, as well as an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Voigt argues: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19827 - 2005-10-03
vehicle, as well as an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Voigt argues: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19827 - 2005-10-03
Jamie A. Rekowski v. Pekin Insurance Co.
A. Rekowski, Gerald Rekowski, and Bernadine Rekowski, his parents, Plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13579 - 2005-03-31
A. Rekowski, Gerald Rekowski, and Bernadine Rekowski, his parents, Plaintiffs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13579 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Brock
. § 961.41(3g)(e). Brock claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress based upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31
. § 961.41(3g)(e). Brock claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress based upon his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7631 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion when No. 2010AP2454-CR 2 it denied his motion for a mistrial after Kevin Burks, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76240 - 2014-09-15
discretion when No. 2010AP2454-CR 2 it denied his motion for a mistrial after Kevin Burks, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
a 1 Stephen Willett is an attorney and represents himself and his spouse on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36960 - 2014-09-15
a 1 Stephen Willett is an attorney and represents himself and his spouse on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36960 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
denying his motion for a new trial.1 The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41819 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion for a new trial.1 The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for agreeing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41819 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Sweat
. Sweat appeals from a judgment ordering him to pay $364,597.23 in restitution to the victims of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19
. Sweat appeals from a judgment ordering him to pay $364,597.23 in restitution to the victims of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19