Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38681 - 38690 of 46040 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] State v. Willie S. Davis
all the way back and held in position. He also testified that he performed tests on the gun which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20259 - 2017-09-21

James J. Mc Mahon v. Standard Bank and Trust Company
that Warsco did not establish “revocability” as the test for whether a living trust was valid. See Koppelkam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9039 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] The Manor Enterprises, Inc. v. Vivid, Inc.
of the test for bailment. A bailment depends upon the voluntary assumption of possession and control
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14152 - 2014-09-15

Dawn Sukala v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
clarified its ruling in Mullen II: [T]his court did not promulgate a two-part test under which a plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6078 - 2005-03-31

State v. James M. Evers
under the performance and prejudice tests set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13979 - 2005-03-31

Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
invitation to look to the “balancing of interest” test employed by some jurisdictions to resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16099 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance. The two- prong test for claims of ineffective assistance of counsel requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100897 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
colloquy did not establish the first prong of the test—that he was “ma[king] a deliberate choice, absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=396387 - 2021-07-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the fourth criterion of the test under WIS. STAT. § 803.09(1). It is that they came so far from meeting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=676596 - 2023-07-07

[PDF] WI APP 172
, this “is not an outcome-determinative test.” Rather, “the touchstone of the prejudice component is ‘whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56996 - 2014-09-15