Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38691 - 38700 of 45872 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 38691 - 38700 of 45872 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the prejudice component of the test, the defendant must affirmatively prove that the alleged defect in counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
to the prejudice component of the test, the defendant must affirmatively prove that the alleged defect in counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
State v. Kevin C. Spinks
Here, we need address only the prejudice component of the ineffective assistance test. Spinks’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18386 - 2005-06-06
Here, we need address only the prejudice component of the ineffective assistance test. Spinks’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18386 - 2005-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Hedlund, 337 Wis. 2d 634, ¶21. “This test means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96858 - 2013-05-15
are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Hedlund, 337 Wis. 2d 634, ¶21. “This test means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96858 - 2013-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence is governed by a three-step test: the evidence must be offered for an acceptable purpose under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50827 - 2010-06-15
evidence is governed by a three-step test: the evidence must be offered for an acceptable purpose under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50827 - 2010-06-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2015AP512 5 The test for deficient performance is whether counsel’s representation “‘fell below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196909 - 2017-09-26
). No. 2015AP512 5 The test for deficient performance is whether counsel’s representation “‘fell below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196909 - 2017-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that the other-acts evidence satisfied all three prongs of the Sullivan test. It also gave the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101482 - 2013-09-03
that the other-acts evidence satisfied all three prongs of the Sullivan test. It also gave the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101482 - 2013-09-03
COURT OF APPEALS
and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Id. at 249-50. Singler’s arguments do not meet this test. In any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85394 - 2012-07-25
and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Id. at 249-50. Singler’s arguments do not meet this test. In any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85394 - 2012-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
novo review). ¶13 The test for fairness in a lineup depends upon the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141465 - 2017-09-21
novo review). ¶13 The test for fairness in a lineup depends upon the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141465 - 2017-09-21
Clark Wolff v. Grant County Board of Adjustment
id. The test that we apply is an objective one. See Bertler v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 86 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14581 - 2005-03-31
id. The test that we apply is an objective one. See Bertler v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 86 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14581 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph E. G.
test. However, he contends that there is no rational basis for the legislature’s omission of false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16310 - 2005-03-31
test. However, he contends that there is no rational basis for the legislature’s omission of false
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16310 - 2005-03-31