Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3871 - 3880 of 12505 for mr.

COURT OF APPEALS
whatever fine was imposed. ¶4 The trial court ruled: All right. At this time Mr. Cooper is here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09

COURT OF APPEALS
. As the court stated: “However, it is also clear to the Court that these monies were in accounts held in Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28997 - 2007-05-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Counsel stated that his “biggest concern was without any explanation or indication that Mr. Campbell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318262 - 2020-12-29

[PDF] State v. Scott A. Church
the State’s closing argument when the prosecutor made the following statement: Mr. Church never gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4954 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that “Mr. Sorenson’s objective is not to withdraw his plea. Rather, he only wants a lesser sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107627 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Mr. Procknow, I’ve had – been provided by your attorney with a plea questionnaire and waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34263 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that I actually talked to Mr. Deegan about that. In fact, I said, you know, I have concerns, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535120 - 2022-06-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Lopez had repeatedly withheld the child from Lohrentz in bad faith. As the court stated: I think Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73910 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
or concurrent, it appeared to me at that time after I made the offer in good belief that Mr. Xiong had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30097 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Darryl H. Stegall
. THE COURT: But you understand by reason of your plea you’re waiving your rights to contest that issue, Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13384 - 2017-09-21