Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3871 - 3880 of 12798 for se.
Search results 3871 - 3880 of 12798 for se.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Chad Stites, pro se, argues that the repeater enhancement portion of his sentence is void
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102157 - 2017-09-21
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Chad Stites, pro se, argues that the repeater enhancement portion of his sentence is void
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
B. Campbell, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53053 - 2014-09-15
B. Campbell, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53053 - 2014-09-15
Willie E. Garrette v. Mary E. Buie-Garrette
, pro se, appeals a judgment of divorce. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4870 - 2005-03-31
, pro se, appeals a judgment of divorce. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4870 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony M. Printup
, on October 16, 1995, and Dakota County, Minnesota, on February 11, 1999. Printup appeared pro se in both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7672 - 2005-03-31
, on October 16, 1995, and Dakota County, Minnesota, on February 11, 1999. Printup appeared pro se in both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7672 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David L. Williams v. Patricia Garro
. Before Eich, C.J., Gartzke, P.J., and Vergeront, J. PER CURIAM. David Williams, a pro se inmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7791 - 2017-09-19
. Before Eich, C.J., Gartzke, P.J., and Vergeront, J. PER CURIAM. David Williams, a pro se inmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7791 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Willie E. Garrette v. Mary E. Buie-Garrette
Buie-Garrette, pro se, appeals a judgment of divorce. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4870 - 2017-09-19
Buie-Garrette, pro se, appeals a judgment of divorce. The issues are: (1) whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4870 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Albert Howard, pro se, appeals an order denying Howard’s motion for postconviction DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91779 - 2013-01-15
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Albert Howard, pro se, appeals an order denying Howard’s motion for postconviction DNA
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91779 - 2013-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Melvin Shelton, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484965 - 2022-02-22
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Melvin Shelton, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484965 - 2022-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Nakeita V. Montgomery Shaw, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97316 - 2013-05-28
. Before Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Nakeita V. Montgomery Shaw, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97316 - 2013-05-28
COURT OF APPEALS
Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Titus Pitts, pro se, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51622 - 2010-07-06
Fine, Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Titus Pitts, pro se, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51622 - 2010-07-06