Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38711 - 38720 of 55165 for n c.
Search results 38711 - 38720 of 55165 for n c.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the public. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39- 46 & n.11, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. Given
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042665 - 2025-11-26
the public. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39- 46 & n.11, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. Given
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042665 - 2025-11-26
State v. Harry L. Gant
closing argument. The prosecutor stated: [I]n order to acquit Harry Gant, you must believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2005-03-31
closing argument. The prosecutor stated: [I]n order to acquit Harry Gant, you must believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5963 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously exercised its discretion. State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 367 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
erroneously exercised its discretion. State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 367 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09
CA Blank Order
District I September 2, 2015 To: Hon. Lindsey Canonie Grady Milwaukee County Courthouse 901 N
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148198 - 2015-09-01
District I September 2, 2015 To: Hon. Lindsey Canonie Grady Milwaukee County Courthouse 901 N
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148198 - 2015-09-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
via WIS. STAT. ch. 227. Sec. 66.0307(9). After the sixty-day time period has run, “[n]o action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697699 - 2023-09-06
via WIS. STAT. ch. 227. Sec. 66.0307(9). After the sixty-day time period has run, “[n]o action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697699 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Kvalo
not administered. Swanson, 164 Wis. 2d at 453 n.6. In Swanson those circumstances included unexplained erratic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
not administered. Swanson, 164 Wis. 2d at 453 n.6. In Swanson those circumstances included unexplained erratic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6084 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2011 WI 28, ¶¶47-48 & n.11, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828. As in Bastian v. State, 54 Wis. 2d 240
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169907 - 2017-09-21
, 2011 WI 28, ¶¶47-48 & n.11, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828. As in Bastian v. State, 54 Wis. 2d 240
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169907 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2004 WI 15, ¶7, 269 Wis. 2d 1, 675 N.W.2d 449. “[A]n officer must have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2012-05-01
, 2004 WI 15, ¶7, 269 Wis. 2d 1, 675 N.W.2d 449. “[A]n officer must have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81800 - 2012-05-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
5 Putnam v. Time Warner Cable of SE Wis., 2002 WI 108, ¶13 n.4, 255 Wis. 2d 447, 649 N.W.2d 626
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131977 - 2017-09-21
5 Putnam v. Time Warner Cable of SE Wis., 2002 WI 108, ¶13 n.4, 255 Wis. 2d 447, 649 N.W.2d 626
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131977 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leon R. Steinle
sufficiency of the evidence claim. See State v. Johnson, 184 Wis. 2d 324, 345 n.7, 516 N.W.2d 463 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2279 - 2005-03-31
sufficiency of the evidence claim. See State v. Johnson, 184 Wis. 2d 324, 345 n.7, 516 N.W.2d 463 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2279 - 2005-03-31