Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38721 - 38730 of 83161 for case code.
Search results 38721 - 38730 of 83161 for case code.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Milwaukee County Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91964 - 2013-01-23
. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 In Milwaukee County Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91964 - 2013-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances of this case. Whyte additionally claimed “postconviction” counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141618 - 2015-05-11
the circumstances of this case. Whyte additionally claimed “postconviction” counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141618 - 2015-05-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194442 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided after his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48903 - 2014-09-15
by considering improper factors; (2) a United States Supreme Court case decided after his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48903 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 46
2014 WI APP 46 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2692-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109975 - 2017-09-21
2014 WI APP 46 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2692-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for summary judgment is predicated on a legal issue totally dispositive of the case, the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93420 - 2014-09-15
motion for summary judgment is predicated on a legal issue totally dispositive of the case, the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93420 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Leo Barron Hicks
2004 WI 12 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-2197-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16662 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI 12 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-2197-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16662 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tecia D.B.
assigned to Tecia’s case in September 1997, testified that Tecia’s visits with her children were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6837 - 2017-09-20
assigned to Tecia’s case in September 1997, testified that Tecia’s visits with her children were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6837 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
offense OWI convictions in order to reduce the penalty enhancement in the pending case. Bucknell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54975 - 2014-09-15
offense OWI convictions in order to reduce the penalty enhancement in the pending case. Bucknell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54975 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed not to prosecute cases involving two other children. Each side was free to argue at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98448 - 2013-06-24
agreed not to prosecute cases involving two other children. Each side was free to argue at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98448 - 2013-06-24