Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38731 - 38740 of 44722 for part.

COURT OF APPEALS
that the court answer “yes” to this question, as well as two related questions.[3] Part of Brooks’ argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62023 - 2011-03-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). Here, Jones 3 As part of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=396387 - 2021-07-22

[PDF] NOTICE
himself. Stand-by counsel was appointed to assist, but for the most part, the defendant ran the show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31640 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Leo E. Wanta
Section 971.14(4)(b), STATS., states in relevant part: If the defendant stands mute or claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13586 - 2017-09-21

State v. Marty R. Caban
the marijuana found during the search. ¶9 The written motion, cited in relevant part below,[2] asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16907 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Central Limited v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
for prior years (when there is no fault on the part of the taxpayer) implicates two important, and competing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15032 - 2005-03-31

State v. David J. Wolfe
a continuous term of incarceration, any part of which was imposed for a sexually violent offense. Id. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2832 - 2005-03-31

Rita Roth v. City of Glendale
of the parties, not the policy preferences of this court. The majority relies in part on the policy articulated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17326 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 107
“in the context in which it is used” by considering words “not in isolation but as part of a whole.” Id., ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86802 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 39
Attorney LeSieur's argument that we are compelled to recognize his "appeal." Rule 22.17 is part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96433 - 2014-09-15