Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38741 - 38750 of 69450 for as he.

Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
of protection and services (CHIPS) under Wis. Stat. § 48.13. He claims that: (1) the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2005-03-31

Michael P. Rogers v. Cathy Rogers
three children.[1] He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3186 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Thomas M.P. v. Kimberly J.L.
. Thomas argues that he was denied due process when the court dismissed his paternity action prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10512 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Cleophus Amerson
of a child, contrary to § 948.02(1), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying him postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9791 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the death of Dennis Huelse. He also appeals from a circuit court order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947326 - 2025-04-30

[PDF] Leon Bunker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
for unemployment compensation (U.C.) benefits during the summer of 1992 because he had a "reasonable assurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8530 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Kreutz
that: (a) He or she is deemed to have consented to tests under sub. (2); (b) If testing is refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8595 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (Citizen Mathematicians)
and Statistical Sciences and an Adjunct Professor of Computer Science at Marquette University. He is a past
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/comdecinjreliefcitmath.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] State v. Matthew T. Doughty
to suppress custodial statements he made to police. Doughty was ultimately convicted upon a jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6617 - 2017-09-19

Paul S. Gantner v. Diane Jo Gantner
, the circuit court’s memorandum decision states: [T]he Court has considered the factors set forth in Section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3809 - 2005-03-31