Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38741 - 38750 of 84004 for simple case search.
Search results 38741 - 38750 of 84004 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Thomas W. Reimann v. Capt. Joseph Topp
), and State ex rel. Morke v. Donnelly, 155 Wis.2d 521, 455 N.W.2d 893 (1990). The cases do not control here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7746 - 2017-09-19
), and State ex rel. Morke v. Donnelly, 155 Wis.2d 521, 455 N.W.2d 893 (1990). The cases do not control here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7746 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
incorrectly—that the Menzer case was a read-in. ¶3 Uitz filed a postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88170 - 2012-10-15
incorrectly—that the Menzer case was a read-in. ¶3 Uitz filed a postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88170 - 2012-10-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2 The sentencing proceeding in this case was consolidated with Hayslett’s sentencing for two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015544 - 2025-09-30
. 2 The sentencing proceeding in this case was consolidated with Hayslett’s sentencing for two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015544 - 2025-09-30
State v. Michael J. Kidd
right to counsel was violated in two previous drunk driving cases because the record does not reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4986 - 2005-03-31
right to counsel was violated in two previous drunk driving cases because the record does not reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4986 - 2005-03-31
Melvin Reed v. Andrew Automotive Group
or abused its discretion by granting summary judgment, dismissing appellants[’] case on the merits.” We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14339 - 2005-03-31
or abused its discretion by granting summary judgment, dismissing appellants[’] case on the merits.” We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14339 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=748852 - 2024-01-09
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=748852 - 2024-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Kendrick C. East III
on October 29, 2002, claiming that the case should be dismissed for noncompliance with his prompt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6365 - 2017-09-19
on October 29, 2002, claiming that the case should be dismissed for noncompliance with his prompt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6365 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2021 WI 5 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP1651-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328776 - 2021-01-27
2021 WI 5 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP1651-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328776 - 2021-01-27
State v. Troy A. Bruley
Bruley likens this case to State v. Fields, 2000 WI App 218, 239 Wis. 2d 38, 619 N.W.2d 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5192 - 2005-03-31
Bruley likens this case to State v. Fields, 2000 WI App 218, 239 Wis. 2d 38, 619 N.W.2d 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5192 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine the opposing party’s submissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101575 - 2017-09-21
case for summary judgment. If they do, then we examine the opposing party’s submissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101575 - 2017-09-21