Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38761 - 38770 of 69002 for had.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of 5, Dr. Rypma did not believe that Duke had more than a thirty- five percent risk for reoffending
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110177 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
because both parties requested the court do so, without determining whether either party had carried
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127892 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. William D. Ridgely
that there were no records concerning Hurt after his ch. 980 action because that action had not been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13140 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Manuel L. Riley
not present, had an expectation of privacy which is protected by the constitutional prohibition against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12797 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
also asserts that he told trial counsel about Wendy Davenport, a citizen witness, who purportedly had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833963 - 2024-08-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Williamson provided his name and implicated himself in illegal activity, specifying that he had purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186080 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Neumann had not met the burden of proof on her adverse possession claim. We will not reverse the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134443 - 2017-09-21

Glendenning's Limestone & Ready-Mix Company, Inc. v. Michael A. Reimer
facility in which they had a leasehold interest; that the majority of the work on the facility
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21305 - 2006-02-08

COURT OF APPEALS
court took into account that Fitzpatrick had twenty-five prior criminal convictions, including “various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59984 - 2011-02-14

COURT OF APPEALS
, or placed in the position he or she would have been in, had the [event] not occurred.’” See State v. Dugan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75605 - 2011-12-27