Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38771 - 38780 of 69052 for he.
Search results 38771 - 38780 of 69052 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
mitigating factors; (2) his due process rights were violated when he was sentenced based upon information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30845 - 2007-11-13
mitigating factors; (2) his due process rights were violated when he was sentenced based upon information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30845 - 2007-11-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the plea agreement. Galvin further argues that he is entitled to a new sentencing in the interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33656 - 2014-09-15
of the plea agreement. Galvin further argues that he is entitled to a new sentencing in the interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33656 - 2014-09-15
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Antonio M.
) there was evidence of his positive parenting skills; (4) he provided money; (5) several counselors testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4017 - 2005-03-31
) there was evidence of his positive parenting skills; (4) he provided money; (5) several counselors testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4017 - 2005-03-31
State v. Angela J.
to three, on the question whether Angela had a substantial relationship with Joseph. He stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2633 - 2005-03-31
to three, on the question whether Angela had a substantial relationship with Joseph. He stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statements after he was placed in handcuffs but before Miranda warnings were administered. See Miranda v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607579 - 2023-01-05
statements after he was placed in handcuffs but before Miranda warnings were administered. See Miranda v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607579 - 2023-01-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
received the pathologist’s report on June 14, 2010. He then called the Paynters’ home telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245730 - 2019-08-27
received the pathologist’s report on June 14, 2010. He then called the Paynters’ home telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245730 - 2019-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a review of existing course materials. Specifically, he responded: Mr. Krueger did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170590 - 2017-09-21
a review of existing course materials. Specifically, he responded: Mr. Krueger did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170590 - 2017-09-21
Julie L. Weber v. Angelene White
' sole witness concerning future health care expenses. He stated that Julie Weber had suffered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16727 - 2005-03-31
' sole witness concerning future health care expenses. He stated that Julie Weber had suffered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
factors; (2) his due No. 2007AP342-CR 2 process rights were violated when he was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30845 - 2014-09-15
factors; (2) his due No. 2007AP342-CR 2 process rights were violated when he was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30845 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Christopher G. Tillman
a postconviction order rejecting his double jeopardy and multiplicity claims and his further claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7450 - 2017-09-20
a postconviction order rejecting his double jeopardy and multiplicity claims and his further claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7450 - 2017-09-20