Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38771 - 38780 of 57152 for id.
Search results 38771 - 38780 of 57152 for id.
State v. Alvin Dawson
of the statute itself to determine whether the language is clear or ambiguous.” Id. It is a long-standing rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8146 - 2005-03-31
of the statute itself to determine whether the language is clear or ambiguous.” Id. It is a long-standing rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8146 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and apply constitutional principles to the facts de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶10 Alonso first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166505 - 2017-09-21
and apply constitutional principles to the facts de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶10 Alonso first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166505 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jaruthh M. Gathings
was “`unreasonable and contrary to the actions of an ordinarily prudent lawyer.'” Id. at 11, 374 N.W.2d at 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9313 - 2017-09-19
was “`unreasonable and contrary to the actions of an ordinarily prudent lawyer.'” Id. at 11, 374 N.W.2d at 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9313 - 2017-09-19
The Landings LLC v. The City of Waupaca
of the statute. Id. A statute is ambiguous if the statutory language is capable of being understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19123 - 2005-08-30
of the statute. Id. A statute is ambiguous if the statutory language is capable of being understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19123 - 2005-08-30
2006 WI APP 202
of a manifest injustice. Id. With respect to an Alford plea, “the factual basis requirement is only satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26455 - 2006-10-30
of a manifest injustice. Id. With respect to an Alford plea, “the factual basis requirement is only satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26455 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
State v. George Reed
of this inquiry if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one. See id. at 697. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13073 - 2017-09-21
of this inquiry if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one. See id. at 697. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13073 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Candice C. Sheppard v. Thomas A. Starkey, M.D.
to observe and evaluate whether such relief is appropriate. Id. Accordingly, we will look for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2210 - 2017-09-19
to observe and evaluate whether such relief is appropriate. Id. Accordingly, we will look for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2210 - 2017-09-19
Eric D.B. v. Denise L.B.
erroneous, or that the custody determination represents a clear abuse of discretion. See id. at 498. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2390 - 2005-03-31
erroneous, or that the custody determination represents a clear abuse of discretion. See id. at 498. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2390 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶12 We begin with a discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938176 - 2025-04-11
of constitutional principles to those facts.” Id. (citation omitted). ¶12 We begin with a discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938176 - 2025-04-11
[PDF]
Amber J.F. v. Richard B.
and the vexatious, repetitious and needless claim on the other hand.'" Id. at 550, 525 N.W.2d at 727 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9727 - 2017-09-19
and the vexatious, repetitious and needless claim on the other hand.'" Id. at 550, 525 N.W.2d at 727 (quoting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9727 - 2017-09-19